|
Home
Page
Convert Traditional IRA
dollars to Roth IRA Dollars
a
"once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity"
Authorized
Reprint
By David G. Freitag, CLU, ChFC, CRPC
David G. Freitag, CLU, ChFC, CRPC, is Vice President of Marketing
Impact Technologies Group. He can be reached at
Dave.Freitag@impact-tech.com.
Coming on January 1, 2010 is a
“once-in-a-lifetime”
opportunity for every person
in the United States who has retirement money saved in traditional
IRAs or other qualified plans. Without earnings limits
they can convert to a
Roth IRA.
This conversion
opportunity
allows for tax-free growth
of their retirement investment dollars while
spreading their tax liabilities across 2011 and 2012. Yet, when
considering whether your clients should convert traditional IRA dollars
to Roth IRA dollars, it is reallyall about tax rates.
If taxes are high, there is one major advantage with the traditional
IRA, or any other type of pre-tax retirement savings plan. The money is
tax-sheltered from those high rates. When the money is withdrawn and
the rates are low, income taxes are paid at the lower rate. The inverse
is true if the rates are currently low, but increase
in the future. Retirement savings invested in a Roth IRA at today’s low
tax rates are immune from future income tax rate increases, forever.
Are there any clues we should look for?
Clues
To Indicate Rising Tax
Rates
How
does one know if tax rates will go up or down in the future?
As
people approach retirement, or are already in
retirement, what clues
might indicate that tax rates could be on the rise in the
near future?
CLUE
1
- The 35 percent top marginal tax bracket today
is the lowest
since Ronald Reagan was president and just a little
higher than
the rates in effect when Calvin Coolidge was in office. The
sunset
provisions in the current tax law, with no Congressional
votes needed, will force the rates to revert to those
effective in
2000. The 2000 top bracket rate was 39.6 percent.
- Today, a married couple earning $200,000,
filing jointly under the
existing 35 percent rate structure, would pay an estimated $44,264 in
federal income tax. That same couple, filing jointly after the sunset
of the Bush tax cuts, would pay an estimated $55,049 on the same
$200,000 of earned income. What appears to be a small tax rate increase
of only 4.6 percent actually results in a whopping tax payment increase
of 24.3 percent.
CLUE
2
- The basis in the tax code between married
couples filing jointly and
single tax payers has never gone away. Assuming that the Bush tax cuts
do sunset, a single tax payer would pay $60,051 or $5,002 more than a
married couple. In retirement planning, it is important to remember
that eventually all joint-filing tax payers will become single-filing
tax payers.
CLUE
3
- The following Federal Budget items have been
well documented in the
national press over the past few months:
• The cost of the war since 2001, based on rough estimates, is over
$904 billion dollars
• The “Cash for Clunkers” program cost $3 billion in just two months
• The “Detroit Bailout” cost $39 billion over the past year
• The Federal bailout of Wall Street, TARP Program, cost $700 billion
CLUE
4
- The top marginal tax bracket during the Kennedy
administration
was an eye-popping 91 percent. The top marginal income
tax brackets have traditionally averaged above 60 percent in the
United States.
CLUE
5
- In 2009, the amount of the federal deficit will
approach $2 trillion
dollars. The deficit in 2009 is the largest in the history of this
country.
UPDATE - Our National Debt
Currently as of March 2010.
The U.S. Debt is estimated at: $12,278,635,997,966.88 Your share of today's public debt is:
$39,934.67
Congressional Record Data
.
THE
HIGHER-INCOME TAXPAYER PARADOX
Lori Montgomery, in her Washington Post article dated September 9,
2009, quoted Timothy Geithner in a statement on ABC News: “We have to
bring these deficits down very dramatically and
that’s going to require some very hard choices.”
In the Washington world of political rhetoric,
when it comes to taxes,
“hard choices” usually mean that tax rates are going up. When you look
at the clues, and these clues do not even consider the impact of health
insurance reform, it is virtually impossible to believe that the
current 35 percent top bracket will last into the foreseeable
future.
The
people who are going to be paying those tax increases are those with
high incomes. The people with high incomes have a target painted on
their chests that will invite a series of unwelcome visits from Uncle
Sam.
This leads to something called the “Higher-Income Taxpayer Paradox.”
This paradox assumes that wealthy people who have saved money in
qualified plans at low tax rates will, at retirement, take money out of
qualified plans at high tax rates. This great strategy for the
government is not a very good strategy for higher income retirees.
The best solution to this tax-rate savings paradox is the Roth IRA. The
Roth IRA requires that taxes be paid upfront,
and for this upfront payment, the
Roth IRA offers
great flexibility to the taxpayer.
With
the Roth IRA, there are no required minimum distributions at age 701/2, and
the money in the Roth IRA grows tax-free. Generally,
there is no income tax on the withdrawals from a Roth IRA. Plus, there
are no IRS
taxes imposed on beneficiaries of Roth IRAs.
In addition, contributions can be made to a Roth IRA after age 701/2
when there is still earned income. Ideally, Roth IRA contributions
are made when taxes are low, and withdrawn tax-free during retirement
when taxes are higher.
In a word, the Roth IRA is a great deal. It
is such a great deal that
higher
income retirement savers were prohibited from participation
by
the government.
If individuals had modified
adjusted gross income (MAGI) of over
$100,000, participation in the Roth world was either restricted or not
available at all. The legislative thinking was that the very liberal,
tax-friendly, Roth tax-advantaged savings plans should only be extended
to lower-income wage earners.
2010
ROTH CONVERSION EVENT OPPORTUNITY
Here is the
good news.
 On January 1, 2010 the $100,000
MAGI restriction
for Roth Conversions is eliminated. All
taxpayers can convert their existing Traditional IRA accounts,
their 401(k) plan balances, and their 403(b) plan balances
into Roth IRAs. Although new contributions to Roth accounts
are still subject to earned income limits, for the higher
income taxpayers, this new conversion opportunity may be the
only way to get into the Roth arena.
What’s the catch? The catch is that income tax must be paid on the
withdrawals from traditional tax-qualified accounts to make the
conversion. The good news is that the tax on conversions in 2010 may be
at one of the lowest tax rates in recent history.
The better news is that the tax burden
created by the withdrawals in 2010 can be
spread over 2011 and 2012 equally. The government is here
to help,
after all, or is it? There might be some urgency to pay all of the tax
due in 2010. The downside to spreading the tax over two years is that
the tax rates could be incrementally higher in those years than they
are now.
The Roth conversion is a tax-diversification strategy that injects
flexibility into a retirement plan. The Roth conversion creates an
excellent pool of capital that can be passed along to children or
grandchildren, income-tax-free.
Unfortunately,
according to an on line study of investors made by Fidelity between
August 14th and August 28th, 2009, most people were not aware that the
Roth IRA would be available to them in 2010. Of the 800 participants in
the
study, 88 percent said that they were unaware of the conversion
opportunity and 34 percent did not understand the tax implications of
the Roth IRA conversion.
As attractive as Roth conversions are for wealthy tax payers, the
personal circumstances of each tax payer will ultimately determine if
making a Roth conversion is a good idea. And, that’s when the
assistance of a qualified financial professional is critical to
investors.
When it comes to making this type of decision, it
is helpful for
financial professionals to “model” the conversions for their clients
using software tools. A good
software analysis model should project
three scenarios:
- What happens if you do nothing and taxes
increase, decrease or remain the same?
- What happens if you make a Roth conversion and
pay the tax due with assets not in the qualified plan?
- What happens if you make a Roth conversion and
pay the tax due with funds from the qualified plan itself?
If your clients hold assets in traditional tax-qualified accounts and
you think that tax rates are going to rise, the time for action is now.
An analysis based on these three scenarios will show if this conversion
strategy is a fit for any of your clients. For those clients, you
should begin to educate them today about the new rules which will
position you to hit the ground running on January 2.
See Daves interview on the Wealth-Channel....as well as other advanced marketing subjects.
Helping
clients improve their
retirement financial plan by making a Roth conversion is a
“once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity that should not be missed.
Learn
and Earn - Go to our Help Library
for
more articles
like this.
Return from this Convert
traditional IRA dollars to Roth IRA dollars page
to the Financial
Planning Software page.
|